Download The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2) Free Books Full Version

Describe Books In Pursuance Of The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)

Original Title:	The Open Society and Its Enemies: 2. Hegel and Marx
ISBN:	0415278422 (ISBN13: 9780415278423)
Edition Language:	English
Series:	The Open Society and its Enemies #2

The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)

Karl Popper

Paperback | Pages: 470 pages

Rating: 4.02 | 1975 Users | 72 Reviews

Representaion Toward Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)

Written in political exile in New Zealand during the World War II and first published in two volumes in 1945, Karl Poppers The Open Society and its Enemies was hailed by Bertrand Russell as a vigorous and profound defence of democracy. Its now legendary attack on the philosophies of Plato, Hegel and Marx prophesied the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and exposed the fatal flaws of socially engineered political systems.

Declare Based On Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)

Title	:	The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
Author	:	Karl Popper
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	Deluxe Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 470 pages
Published	:	July 11th 2003 by Routledge (first published 1945)
Categories	:	Philosophy. Politics. Nonfiction. History

Rating Based On Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)

Ratings: 4.02 From 1975 Users | 72 Reviews

Write Up Based On Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)

Many Marxists consider that knowledge is determined by cultural and social norms, but Popper rejects this idea as absurd. His main argument is that Marxists ignored famous examples from the history of science, such as Copernicuss heliocentric theory of the solar system that was created independently from the cultural prejudices of the sixteenth century. This leads us to the conclusion that scientific knowledge does not depend on society. Popper totally destroyed the so-called,,sociology of

From Plato to Hegel, the philosopher king is the summit of socialism everywhere, a system in which the "good" thinker knows what is best for all individuals. Karl Popper prefers the free society and counts neo-Platonism among his enemies. Having been raised in an authoritarian Communist culture in Austria, Popper rejected "historicism" in ascertaining that the growth of human knowledge is a causal factor in the evolution of human history, and since "no society can predict, scientifically, its

- thinking in the solving problems need logics or an experience? - are we should trade one way? - are we all search for many answers at same time? - is there an answer without a question?

Not nearly as engaging as Volume I. It might be because the material of Hegel's and Marx's philosophies are necessarily more complex than that of Plato and Aristotle. But I also got the impression that Popper, through a large part of the volume, left the discussion of an "open society" off to the side while he treated his preferred topic of historicism, along with other, less relevant tangents (many having to do with Marx's economic theories). The result was a book that I labored to get through,

4 1/2 stars. This is a pretty extensive refutation of Marx's (inspired by Hegel's) historicism. "Scientific Marxism is dead," Popper claims, and that's also an apt summary of the work as a whole. I think that he is undoubtedly right in the main in his treatment of Marx, and I'm obviously not going to go through the arguments he proffers against Marx's historicism, but I'll just provide some general remarks and one criticism.First, although it's clear that Popper abhors historicism, his treatment

very plausibly skips over 25 centuries to tie marxism directly into plato.

In his second volume Poper turns his attention to the more modern philosophers Hegel and Marx. Again Poppers book doesn't tell anyone who has read Hegel or Marx things they didn't already know or suspect. What's interesting is the way Popper manages to place these philosophers and men into their time and place in history, They way he clearly sees why their theories fall and his suggestions for a successful way forward for an open society, many of which are common place in western democracies.