Itemize Based On Books Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000
| Title | : | Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 |
| Author | : | L. Ron Hubbard |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 1050 pages |
| Published | : | January 2001 by Galaxy Press (first published 1982) |
| Categories | : | Science Fiction. Fiction. Fantasy |
L. Ron Hubbard
Paperback | Pages: 1050 pages Rating: 3.52 | 16448 Users | 1252 Reviews
Narrative Conducive To Books Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000
"Nonstop and fast-paced. Every paragraph has a big bang-up adventure." —Kevin J. AndersonSuspense, thrills, action and adventure. Earth has been dominated for 1,000 years by an alien invader—and man is an endangered species. From the handful of surviving humans a courageous leader emerges—Jonnie Goodboy Tyler, who challenges the invincible might of the alien Psychlo empire in a battle of epic scale, danger and intrigue with the fate of the Earth and of the universe in the tenuous balance.
Specify Books In Favor Of Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000
| Original Title: | Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 |
| Edition Language: | English URL http://battlefieldearth.com/ |
| Characters: | Jonnie Goodboy Tyler, Terl, Zzzt, Pattie, Robert si Rubah |
| Literary Awards: | Audie Award for Excellence in Marketing (2017), Saturn Award, Golden Scroll Award, Gutenberg Award, Prix Cosmos 2000 (1989) Tetradrama D’Oro Award, Golden Earphone Award for 2016 Audio Production from Audiofile (2016) |
Rating Based On Books Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000
Ratings: 3.52 From 16448 Users | 1252 ReviewsJudge Based On Books Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000
Don't be put off by the fact that the founder of Scientology wrote this novel, and definitely don't let the horrendous movie throw you off. This book is incredible! Well, at the least the first 3/4 of the book is. The last few chapters are interesting, but not gripping, as they detail the events that occur in the aftermath of the climax.My kingdom for an editor! At over 1000 pages, this novel really needed one, but I guess its not so easy to edit a paranoid madman (for thats what L. Ron Hubbard was at this point). He states in the introduction that he didnt make any effort to contain himself while writing Battlefield Earth and it shows. What also shows is the era when Hubbard did the majority of his science fiction writing. Battlefield Earth may have been published in the 1980s, but it reads much more like a novel of the 1950s.
There seems to be an inordinately large number of detractors of this work of science fiction; that for my part seems undeserved. For me, I loved most everything about this book, the social commentary, the science fiction, the authors conceived universe, the satire and comic relief, the pulse pounding drama and adventure and above all, the sure satisfaction of good triumphing over evil. This book has all those things.Hubbard was a gifted writer whose conceived images flow through our minds to
Scanning the first page of reviews I am baffled. Apparent to me is that readers (if you truly read this book) are hung up on other issues than what makes a good sci-fi read, or base opinion on a poorly done film. This book contains over 1000 pages of smooth rock em sock em edge of your pants adventure set in the not so distant future. Perhaps its the lack of vampire sex that turns off readers?Purely speculation, but I bet Stephen Hawking after reading this novel would say to himself, yep! This
This is one of my all time favourite SF novels, and it has nothing to do with the author's Scientology nonsense! Also, don't be fooled by the horrid film adaptation.Read the unabridged edition it when I was 15 or 16. I used sit in the back row in Music class, and read it, but on the second day the teacher saw me. Fortunately, he didn't say or do anything except keep the book during that period. Believe it or not, I am is his landlord now!Critical Acclaim:"A terrific story." - Robert A. Heinlein
Truly godawful drivel. Worse than drivel. Complete and utter garbage. It's hard to say which aspects are worse:the ones Hubbard copied from other writers, or e more elements that he seems to have come up with on his own. I have no major problem with plot well,nets that are reinterpreted form other people's works. There is, after all, very little that is new under the Sun, and Sci Fi is -- often to its benefit -- populated largely by borrowed themes and ideas and archetypal characters who act as
0 comments:
Post a Comment