Identify Based On Books Orthodoxy
| Title | : | Orthodoxy |
| Author | : | G.K. Chesterton |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 168 pages |
| Published | : | July 30th 2008 by Waking Lion Press (first published 1908) |
| Categories | : | Religion. Theology. Christian. Nonfiction. Christianity. Philosophy. Classics |
G.K. Chesterton
Paperback | Pages: 168 pages Rating: 4.18 | 29583 Users | 1647 Reviews
Relation To Books Orthodoxy
This book is meant to be a companion to "Heretics," and to put the positive side in addition to the negative. Many critics complained of the book because it merely criticised current philosophies without offering any alternative philosophy. This book is an attempt to answer the challenge. It is the purpose of the writer to attempt an explanation, not of whether the Christian Faith can be believed, but of how he personally has come to believe it. The book is therefore arranged upon the positive principle of a riddle and its answer. It deals first with all the writer's own solitary and sincere speculations and then with the startling style in which they were all suddenly satisfied by the Christian Theology. The writer regards it as amounting to a convincing creed. But if it is not that it is at least a repeated and surprising coincidence.Be Specific About Books In Pursuance Of Orthodoxy
| Original Title: | Orthodoxy |
| ISBN: | 160096527X (ISBN13: 9781600965272) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Rating Based On Books Orthodoxy
Ratings: 4.18 From 29583 Users | 1647 ReviewsCritique Based On Books Orthodoxy
I learned that the Orthodoxy of the Catholic faith is what keeps it (and the world) sane. It calls to us from our fairy tales while at the same time appealing to our logic.I also learned why so many people, like C.S. Lewis, Scott Hahn, and J.R.R. Tolkien have made reference to G.K. Chesterton - he is brilliant. His mastery of the English language is second to none.The only difficulty of this book is that it may come off as "high-brow" because it was written in the U.K. (and their English isI first read this in 1975. It was a life-saver then. Not sure how many times I have read it since, but Nancy and I just finished reading it aloud together (May 2013). Fantastic, as always.
I read this at a time in my life when I was not receptive to it, too full of modern theologians to get Chesterton's meanings. It is still on my shelf, and will get another reading in time, in this world of the next.
See here for a chapter-by-chapter sketch of an audio version I listened to in 2020.Available online. See Plodcast, Episode #7 and Episode #18.My first Chesterton book. It was slow-going for the first few chapters, but I enjoyed it more as I went on. This book has come up again and again, and I really need to read through it again. Having interacted with it on a deeper level since the first time I read it, I think that I'd give it five stars if I read it again.Here's Piper on why Chesterton's
I read this at a time in my life when I was not receptive to it, too full of modern theologians to get Chesterton's meanings. It is still on my shelf, and will get another reading in time, in this world of the next.
Chesterton is witty but dense; his reasoning requires concentration. If I am reading him and not paying close attention to the trajectory of his thought, I find myself saying, "What is he babbling about? What does this have to do with anything, let alone Christian orthodoxy?" If I am paying attention, however, I often find him extremely insightful, and I wish to highlight nearly ever line. I also find him quite contemporary; what he says seems to apply somehow to every age. This is not
"And though St John the Evangelist saw many strange monsters in his vision, he saw no creature so wild as one of his own commentators" "It was natural, perhaps, that a modern Marxian Socialist should not know anything about free will""The new scientific society definitely discourages men from thinking about death""Mr. McCabe thinks me a slave because I am not allowed to believe in determinism" "But the Greeks were right when they made Apollo the god both of imagination and of sanity, for he
0 comments:
Post a Comment